01 / Traditional
Physical testing has practical limits
An in-person session can observe live ball flight and feel, but its search is necessarily shaped by available time, inventory and the golfer’s swing that day.
Fitting methodology
Both approaches can help golfers make better equipment decisions. Their central difference is the size of the searchable equipment universe and how the golfer is modeled.
Start My Fit01 / Traditional
An in-person session can observe live ball flight and feel, but its search is necessarily shaped by available time, inventory and the golfer’s swing that day.
02 / TruePath
TruePath uses a comprehensive golfer profile to evaluate 150,000+ Pro or 1,000,000+ Elite configurations with a consistent, brand-neutral methodology.
03 / Choice
TruePath does not claim every golfer must choose one method. It creates a remote path for golfers who value breadth, consistency and a clearly explained full-bag blueprint.
Your next step